Saturday, June 02, 2007

RoadRunner 150cc Touring Scooter
$1,299.00 On Sale
Note: Sorry California, the Roadrunner i-scooters are not yet legal in California



The 150 Roadrunner Touring Deluxe Scooter is not as powerful as the 250 and is somewhat lighter with only 320 lbs maximum load rating, but is still highway legal. The high quality of Roadrunner manufacturing is rapidly gaining an excellent reputation. MP3 player and oversized trunk are included. available in Deep Red, Black, Blue, Champagne,Yellow, and Silver. Very little assembly is required. Visit www.motortoyshop.com for a closer look at the RoadRunner I-scooter.

Our Recommendations of reliableInexpensive Luxury Motorscooters -- Best Prices on the Net -- from $1,299

The RoadRunner 250cc Touring Scooter has a water cooled engine capable of freeway touring at 75 MPH. Features include MP3 player, alarm with remote, trunk, weather cover. One of our scooter discussion forum members bought one and is delighted with it. He posted this extensive video of his touring scooter in action.
Test drivers were very inpressed by its stability and comfort. With ample legroom,and rated for 400 lbs load capacity, this is truly a two-person (full sized persons) touring machine. Available in deep red, black, blue, champagne, silver, and yellow.
Like all RoadRunner I-scooters, the 250cc Touring Scooter is specially designed and manufactured to be sold online. They have special packaging, every scooter is tested (real test ride, not just started) at the factory as they are driven off the assembly line to the packaging area of the plant. Very little assembly is required.

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

RoadRunner i -Scooters Hit the Market !!!!

The Latest Scooter to hit the roads is taking the Competition by storm. The RoadRunner Brand i-Scooters have just arrived, and the Quality is second to NONE. RoadRunner has been specifically designed for sales on the Internet...thus the term i-scooter. RoadRunner is offering what few have dared to.....Bumper to Bumper warranty protection, Extended warranty programs, and Service that cannot be beaten. Their easily reached customer service line allows a customer to reach them quickly, and they can answer all questions or parts related issues responsively. They guarantee a quick 48 hour shipping time on all parts requests. They have ALL parts stocked in their Dallas, TX warehouse which is centrally located in the U.S. for a faster shipping time for their customers.
Quality is an issue in the industry, and RoadRunner i -Scooters have taken it a step further by setting up Quality control offices in China. The Offices are actually IN the Manufacturing Facility that builds the RoadRunner i -Scooters. Each bike is inspected and then Actually Driven out of the facility on a Test Ride prior to packaging for shipment. Quality is Job #1 with RoadRunner, and they have done what no other manufacturer has done. They have vastly improved the Quality of the packaging of the RoadRunner i-Scooters to minimize shipping damage. The industry as a whole lacks in this area and RoadRunner has made this consumer concern a priority.
So if Quality and Affordability are a concern.....Be sure to check out a RoadRunner i-Scooter. It's what we have All been waiting for.

We are an Authorized Dealer for RoadRunner i -Scooters. Check out RoadRunner Quality and Warranty and Compare !!
www.motortoyshop.com

Thursday, January 12, 2006

Who is buying and selling your freedom?

Who is buying and selling your freedom?

Many bikers in South Carolina take the right to ride lidless for granted. Thirty one years ago ABATE began a battle that took six years to win and amend the helmet law to allow adult freedom of choice. Now other groups are raising money and using lobbyists in an effort to remove adult freedom of choice in South Carolina. The coalition that worked hard to pass the primary seat belt law in South Carolina is now targeting our current helmet law with the intent to remove adult freedom of choice. The name of this coalition is Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety or AHAS.

Now that the primary seat belt bill has been passed into law in South Carolina an "All-Rider Motorcycle Helmet Law" tops the agenda of AHAS. You do not have to take my word; visit the AHAS web site saferoads.org and see for yourself.

Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety is an alliance of insurance companies with health and safety groups working together to encourage the adoption of federal and state laws. Some of these groups get funding from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; NHTSA found a loophole in their ban from lobbying in state houses by paying others to do the dirty work. Not only are our taxes being used to lobby against our rights but some of the seemingly innocent medical charities funded by poker runs are spending money raised from bikers to lobby against bikers.

You may wish to study these following lists of insurance companies and organizations; we can choose to take our business elsewhere and not support their poker runs cloaked as charity events. State Farm Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Group, Nationwide Insurance, Unitrin, and USAA provide the finical support behind AHAS. The actual lobbying is performed by a coalition of safety nannies including: American College of Emergency Physicians, American Public Health Association, Center for Auto Safety, Consumer Federation of America, Emergency Nurses Association, KIDS AND CARS, Mothers Against Drunk Driving, Police Foundation, Public Citizen, Trauma Foundation, and Whirlwind Wheelchair International.

ABATE of South Carolina will host the annual Helmet Law Rally supporting our state's current helmet law allowing adult freedom of choice on October 9th. The Flying Saucer will host the after rally party immediately following the rally at the capitol steps. DB Bryant will provide live entertainment from 2 until 6. Come join in the brotherhood and join ABATE. Visit abatesc.com/events for more information as the SC Freedom of Choice Helmet Rally approaches. Last year over 1,000 bikers rode in the police escorted parade to the capitol.

Thursday, January 05, 2006

Registration problem led to fatal crash

Registration problem led to fatal crash
Friday night accident under investigation


January 04. 2006 8:00AM

T
he man who fled the police Friday night and crashed his SUV, killing himself and another driver, was sought by officers because his vehicle was not registered, police said yesterday.

Rodney Gladle, 25, hit the gas when Laconia police tried to pull over his SUV near the Laconia-Belmont town line, according to the police. Two Laconia police cars pursued Gladle through Belmont on Route 3.

The officers were advised to disengage by their supervisor, according to Laconia police chief Tom Oetinger. Both cars turned off their sirens and slowed down, but one officer left his car's lights on, Oetinger said. An eyewitness confirmed Oetinger's account.

Gladle, of Laconia, crashed his SUV head-on into a pickup truck driven by David Gonyer, 28, just before the Mosquito Bridge, which connects Belmont and Sanbornton.

Gladle and Gonyer, also of Laconia, were both killed. Their vehicles were so mangled that their bodies had to be extracted, according to Belmont Police Chief Vincent Baiocchetti. A passenger in Gonyer's truck, Jay Sengscucng, was sent to the Lakes Region General Hospital, the police said. As of yesterday morning, Sengscucng was not listed as being at the hospital.

At the time of the crash, Gladle's SUV was around a bend and out of the police officers' line of vision, Oetinger said.

"The distance between where they disengaged and where the accident occurred was relatively short," Oetinger said. "It wasn't even in miles. If you looked at the distance between the town line and the distance of the actual accident, it was a little more than a mile and a half. This incident occurred in minutes."

Neither chief would say how fast Gladle's SUV was going, only that his speed exceeded the 35 mph speed limit.

Gladle's SUV spun around and traveled about 75 yards down Route 3 before stopping, according to witness John Olmstead. He saw the accident happen when he was closing down the Lakeview Bed and Breakfast about 10 p.m. Both vehicles were totaled, with chunks strewn on the road, neighbors said.

The crash is being investigated by three units: Laconia police are conducting an internal investigation into whether department rules were followed in the incident, Oetinger said. Belmont police are performing an accident investigation, which will focus on the people involved, Baiocchetti said. They will pass their results to the Belknap County Accident Reconstruction Team, which will figure out the physics of the crash itself.

Of the three Laconia officers who were involved in the pursuit, only one is currently at work, Oetinger said. One has gone on a previously planned vacation, and the other, who was in the front vehicle, has taken a few days off. Oetinger emphasized he is not being penalized.

"We will talk to him to evaluate his fitness for duty," he said. "Incidents like this, where there are deaths involved, are very difficult for officers. We want to make sure his mental health is cared for."

Laconia has an eight-page policy on vehicular pursuits. It stipulates that the officer involved must conclude that the immediate danger to the public posed by letting the suspect go outweighs the danger posed by the pursuit itself. It requires that the suspect must be wanted for a felony or another offense that requires immediate arrest and that the suspect must pose a danger to human life.

In Gladle's case, officers tried to pull him over because his car was not registered, Oetinger said - he thinks that its temporary registration had expired.

But it's unclear whether the officer's attempt to pull over Gladle, which went on for less than two miles, is considered a full vehicular pursuit.

The Laconia policy defines vehicular pursuit as an attempt by an officer in an emergency vehicle to "apprehend fleeing suspects"and says that a pursuit is "deemed active by the activation of emergency lights and sirens." The policy doesn't make clear where a traffic stop ends and a chase begins.

Baiocchetti, Belmont's chief, was adamant that it was neither a chase nor a pursuit.

In explaining why one of Belmont's officers, who had been nearby on a traffic stop, joined the two Laconia cars, Baiocchetti said: "He followed to make sure there were no issues. He didn't know about the pursuit itself, because there wasn't one. He just followed them in case there were any problems."

Geoffrey Alpert, a professor of criminology at the University of South Carolina who's studied police chases for 20 years, said that about 40 percent of all chases end in a crash.

He said it's not always exactly clear when a chase begins - for example, a woman may wait to pull over until she reaches a lighted area, just to be safe. But to him, an attempted stop automatically becomes a chase when the suspect accelerates to get away, as police said Gladle did.

Chases are so dangerous that they should be reserved for suspected violent felons, Alpert argues. He said that there are two common misconceptions about police chases.

"There are two myths in pursuits: One is there's a dead body in the trunk," he said, describing why police might aggressively pursue someone first suspected of a minor violation. "The other is if we don't chase, everybody's going to flee."

New Hampshire requires that departments have a policy on vehicular pursuits, but the state doesn't lay down any guidelines beyond that, according to Assistant Commissioner of Safety Earl Sweeney.

What makes sense in the open spaces of the North Country may not make sense in the state's cities, Sweeney said.

"There are some departments that say, 'We won't chase for a minor traffic violation,' but the downside to that is could lead to more high-speed driving," he said. "The other thing is, you never know why they're running. Are they running because they just ran a stop sign or is there a kidnapping victim in the car?"

Sweeney monitors police chases as chairman of the Highway Safety Committee of the International Association of Chiefs of Police.

"One of our big goals and objectives is to try and either reduce or eliminate police chases altogether," Sweeney said.

He hopes that one day technology will end the need for police chases. One device being tested would shut off a car's electronic fuel pump; another would interrupt its electronic transmission. There are still kinks to be worked out.

"When they first started testing them, they did things like blow out people's TVs in the neighborhood,"he said. "I would say in the next 10 years there will be something."

For now, Concord has one of the state's most restrictive policies on vehicular pursuits, Sweeney said.

It's eight pages long, said Concord police Maj. Robert Barry, and full of clauses and subclauses, but it essentially only allows police to pursue the violent and potentially violent.

According to Concord police Maj. Robert Barry, the city chased three suspects in 2005. None of those incidents ended with an accident, he said.

Every year, the city's officers have a classroom session in which they're told about the pursuit policy, Barry said.

------ End of article

Sunday, December 18, 2005

TRAFFIC SAFETY

TRAFFIC SAFETY
Seat belt law good, but helmet law needed
By Stuart H. Henderson

The enactment of the S.C. seat belt law is long overdue, and it will hopefully
be enforced in the days ahead. However, one can't help but be puzzled by some
rather blatant inconsistencies in safety requirements.

First of all, why is there no requirement of a helmet to those operating
motorcycles in South Carolina? Falling from a moving motorcycle and hitting an
unprotected head on concrete or asphalt often does some serious damage to what
is inside the skull.

A good friend and co-worker of our son was seriously injured three years ago
when his motorcycle accidentally skidded on wet pavement up in New Hampshire.
Had he been wearing a helmet he would not currently be in a nursing home,
unable to communicate, feed himself or perform any other normal functions for
the rest of his life.

And several years ago a man riding a motorcycle without a helmet skidded off
the road in Little River and died immediately.

The opponents of such legislation might argue that it is their life and their
responsibility, but far too often when accidents do occur the health care
costs are absorbed by the hospitals and general taxpayers through the ever
increasing medical costs to us all.

The same opponents might argue that the wearing of a helmet lessens their
ability to hear automobile horns, etc. while operating their motorcycle. That
argument opens up another inconsistency in requiring automobiles to have
adequate mufflers for noise suppression, but there is no similar requirement
for motorcycles.

There are many other states which require the wearing of helmets by those
operating motorcycles and it is inconceivable why S.C. legislators don't have
the common sense and backbone to enact such legislation.

Why is it that children riding in school buses are not required to wear seat
belts? Perhaps it is the cost, but tell that to the parents of children who
have been seriously injured or killed in school bus accidents over the years.

My hope is that those legislators in Columbia might give some serious thought
to their rationale in the enactment of the new seat belt law and apply the
same common sense and reason in drawing up similar legislation regarding
helmets as well as school bus seat belts.

Thursday, December 08, 2005

Pitster Pro for 2006

As the infant of the Pit Bike industry, GPX Motorsports has taken dramatic steps to
prove its place in the Mini-Bike market. The Pitster Pro Idea was created in the
beginning of 2005, under the close supervision of its President Gary Goodwin, and
“Jimmy Honda”, Lord of the Far East Pit Bikes.

Among numerous amounts of Chinese Pit Bikes, Goodwin and Jimmy, set out to
prove that they could do it better, and offer it for less. Working closely with testers
and engineers, Goodwin brought his ideas to life. Creating a Mini-Bike with more
power and stamina, than any on the market, while maintaining fast flowing lines
and flawless component integration.

“I still cant get over how well everything goes together” - thorwarrior915

Using Jialing-Honda engines, giving his bikes more power and engine life, and only
premium parts, Goodwin, in only a few months has created a reputable name for
GPX and Pitster Pro. And with the release of the new 125X, he expects business to
boom. Offering accessories not found on any other manufactured Pit Bike.

“We’re very impressed with the overall quality of the Pitster Pro. The 124cc engine
is very strong stock and has tons of hop up potential” -T-BOLT Racing

GPX is leading the market with its powerful engine, innovative new single style
swing-arm and adjustable triple clamps, stock aluminum components, wave
rotors, and rear shock with reservoir, at competitive prices.

“All in all, its a great bike” -freeboarder86

The new 125X will receive worldwide recognition with its appearance in popular
magazines and online forums, with showings from local tracks to national races.

The new Pitster Pro 125X, with its fast look and even faster engine, will show
riders that with GPX you will, Ride the Best, and Roost the Rest!

Friday, November 18, 2005

SHOCK ABSORBERS

If the readers here do not mind, I would like to post an article that talks of shock absorbers in an effort to remove any mystery about what they do and how they work. Safety issues are often merely technology issues - once you understand the technology.

To begin with, they do not absorb shocks - your springs do that.

When your bike hits a bump in the road your wheels can do nothing but follow the curve of that bump. Your tires compress fractionally, but not enough to make a meaningful difference in the effects that bump will have on the rest of the bike, and you. If the wheels of your bike were connected directly to the frame, without springs and shocks, the bike would rise at least as high as the bump, almost instantly. The effect, of course, is that, if severe enough, when the bike came back down you would be left in the air. Your hands would probably not be jerked off the grips, so they would be pulled forward with the rest of the bike while the rest of you was still in the air - and then, worse, you would come down.

Obviously, the fix to that problem is to keep as much of the bike other than the wheels from rising in reaction to that bump (i.e., make as much of the bike as possible 'sprung weight'.) There is a tremendous amount of kinetic energy imparted to the wheels when they hit that bump. That energy must be captured before it is transferred to the bike's frame. And that is exactly what the springs do. By compressing, the springs absorb the energy from the wheels.

Remember pogo sticks? If all you had between the wheels and the frame of your bike were springs, then the only difference the springs would make would be a short delay before the bike was tossed into the air after hitting the bump. That is, once compressed the only thing the springs can do is decompress (that's the law). The energy the springs will exert during decompression is almost equal to the energy that went into compressing them in the first place. (A token amount of the kinetic energy will be converted to heat to make up the difference.)

Now we can understand what the shocks do. They DRAMATICALLY slow down the decompression of your springs (and in the process they convert much more than a token of the total kinetic energy stored in those springs into heat.)

A shock absorber consists of a tube filled with oil, which acts as a hydraulic fluid, and a piston (which is not physically connected to any part of the tube) that slides up and down within that tube, pushing its way through the oil. The piston is connected to one end of the shock absorber via a steel rod, the tube is connected to the other. One end of the shock absorber is connected to the frame of the bike while the other end is connected to the wheel hub (or to a swing arm that is connected to the hub.) Thus, when the wheel moves up towards the rest of the bike the piston is pushed thru the oil. The oil provides resistance to the movement of the piston which slows it down. In the process kinetic energy is converted to heat. (This is why you must change your shock absorber oil regularly - the heat breaks it down.) The oil in these tubes would totally stop the movement of the piston were it not for the existence of a valve in the piston that allowed the fluid to pass thru it. This is because, like water, the oil cannot itself be compressed. That valve can be made to allow fluids to flow faster in one direction than the other. For example, you would probably want your springs to compress faster than they are allowed to decompress. Without that valve your springs would not compress at all, leaving you as bad off as if the wheels were directly connected to the frame. Similarly, if the springs are too strong for the load they are carrying, too much of the kinetic energy will be conveyed directly to the frame of the bike, because they will compress too slowly, if at all.

But just as slowing the compression rate of the springs too much results in ineffective control of bumps, allowing their decompression to happen too quickly is just as bad. Were that to happen you would have 'pogo stick' reactions to bumps. So, it is essential that the design of the springs and shocks on your bike take into account how heavy the bike is and what kind of riding you do. But all such designs are compromises, and you can do things to totally frustrate the designers intentions - and end up hurt or worse as a result.

For example, when you put a passenger or heavy luggage on your bike you should increase the tension of the springs surrounding your shocks. Failing to do that can overload the system and get you close to the 'pogo stick' level of responses from them. Taking a street machine into the country, off road, and pretending it's a motocross machine can do the same.

But even assuming you don't do anything that extreme you will find that the design of your shocks is not perfect. (If it was, you would never feel a bump in the road.) The fact is, sometimes the road surface changes from perfectly level to bumpy. And some of those bumps (and potholes) can be awesome. This is where a few dollars can make a difference. You can replace the springs that come stock on your bike with a set that are called 'progressives'. These provide a normal soft ride until they are confronted with an unusually severe bump, at which point they get harder and harder to compress. And while the oil in the shocks cannot be compressed, air can be. So some shocks (aren't GoldWings wonderful?) are 'air assisted' - in addition to the oil they have a small amount of air in the tubes. These 'air assisted' shock systems are sometimes attached to an onboard compressor that can be used to increase or decrease the pressure of the air, thus making the shocks either harder or softer without having to change the compression of the springs when your load weight or the road surface changes substantially. (Also, of course, you can increase the weight of the oil in the shocks to slow them down.)

The shock absorber 'system' on your rear wheel tends to have larger springs and have them mounted on the outside of the hydraulic tubes while the one on your front wheel have the springs within the tubes. The ones in the front are contained within the 'forks'. If you take a close look at your shocks you will find that the ones in the rear are typically angled forward from the wheel to the frame of the bike while the ones in the front are angled backwards. These angles tend to be directly in-line with weight shifts resulting from acceleration and braking.

The angle of the front shocks (forks), usually called the bike's 'rake', is essential to maintain! It establishes, along with the front-end 'offset', the bike's 'trail' which determines the bikes handling and steering control. The more extreme the rake is on your bike, the 'slower' your steering will be. (Except at extremely slow speeds - where extreme rakes often result in the wheel 'flopping' over and dumping the bike if you do not have your hands firmly in control of the grips.) If you were, for example, to lower your bike by shortening the front and back shocks, the wheelbase would also be shortened (the distance between the front and back tires). Since your front wheel would touch the ground closer to directly under your handlebars, your steering would 'quicken' as a result. In fact, even shortening the shocks by only one inch could result in steering that was so fast that your steering damper (another small shock absorber) could not safely handle it. The result, known as a 'tank slapper', would be violent swings of the wheel from side to side, and with high probability a dumped bike. (That is an overstatement. If you absorb some of the oscillation into your arms and avoid transferring that into the rest of the bike (through your contact with the seat), or use some braking caused weight transfer to the front of the bike, you can abort the 'harmonic' and probably avoid dumping it.)

Your shock absorber systems make your bike controllable. Make sure they receive factory recommended oil changes, do not modify them, adjust them for major changes in the weight of your vehicle or expected road conditions, and they will do their jobs reliably.

http://motortoyshop.com

www.motortoyshop.com